Exploring the invisible universe: An interview with Licia Verde MAE#

From childhood wonder to cosmic mysteries, Licia Verde discusses dark matter, dark energy, and why discovery is as much about the journey as the destination.

Professor Licia Verde
Professor Licia Verde


About Licia Verde MAE#

Professor Licia Verde MAE is a leading cosmologist renowned for her work uncovering the universe’s hidden components – dark matter, dark energy, and its large-scale structure. Her research has propelled major advances in cosmology, from pioneering statistical methods that relate galaxy surveys to dark matter, to contributing key insights to NASA’s WMAP mission. Currently, she is ICREA Professor at the Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona.

Professor Verde has received numerous accolades, including the 2012 Gruber Cosmology Prize, the 2018 Breakthrough Prize (with the WMAP team), and the 2024 Medal of the Spanish Royal Physics Society

She was elected as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2025. At the 2025 Building Bridges Annual Conference, she will deliver a plenary speech titled Cosmology.

Read the interview#

What first sparked your curiosity about the universe and made you want to understand how it works?

I have been told that, as a child, I was always curious. When I started learning to read, someone gave me a book about the sky as a present. It covered birds, weather, planes, rockets, space, and the universe. I found birds, weather, and planes somewhat mundane – but space and the universe, now that was something worth the effort of learning to read!

It took me a while, however, to understand that math had to become my friend if I wanted to go beyond the surface in exploring space, the universe, and how it all works. In fact, it wasn’t until I read Galileo – mostly as a literature assignment – that it truly clicked.

It also helped that, during the 1970s, there was a great fascination with physics, and documentaries about physics were shown in prime-time television slots. I could follow those too, and my parents were patient enough to indulge my extravagant curiosity about physics and astronomy.

I was also fortunate to have very good and inspiring teachers, even though I first pursued classical studies before “seeing the light” and deciding to study physics.



Your research focuses on what makes up most of the universe, including dark matter and dark energy- can you explain what these mysterious components are and how they influence the cosmos we see around us?

"Dark matter behaves like matter; it falls under gravity just as any matter we know does. If we squeeze it or dilute it, the relation between density and the volume it occupies is the usual one. If you put a chocolate bar in a box, you have one chocolate bar. If you now double the volume of the box, you still have one chocolate bar – just in a bigger box. So far, so good.

However, dark matter, to a good approximation, interacts only gravitationally. It does not shine and does not feel electromagnetic interactions. When I clap my hands, my hands clap (d’oh). Even though they are made of atoms – and atoms are mostly empty, with tiny nuclei and electrons far away from them – my hands still collide because electromagnetic forces make them do so. If my hands were made of dark matter, I could not clap; they would simply pass through each other.

The effects of dark matter are gravitational. We see dark matter’s gravitational pull on luminous matter, and we see its effect on space-time. As Einstein’s general relativity predicts, mass deforms space-time. From all this, we know there’s a lot of mass out there that cannot be accounted for by the atoms we know exist.

Dark energy, on the other hand, is something completely different. If dark energy were chocolate, then you could put it in a box, and if you were to double the volume of the box, you would get double the chocolate. But, alas, it is not chocolate. It is energy associated with the vacuum. Now it makes (some) sense – if you put nothing in a box and then double the volume of the box, you get twice nothing.

As counterintuitive as it seems, in the form of a cosmological constant, this strange thing was actually introduced by Einstein as a constant term in his equations of general relativity – by hand. His newly developed theory of gravity predicted an unstable universe. But since the universe appeared old and unchanging, it seemed it had to be stable and static – hence the additional term. It turns out that although the universe is not static, Einstein was still correct in adding that term. The universe is undergoing accelerated expansion.

Normal matter, radiation, or even dark matter cannot drive such acceleration. You wouldn’t expect to throw a ball into the air and have it suddenly accelerate upward as if propelled by a rocket. Well, dark energy sort of behaves like that. Its effect is seen as the accelerated expansion of the universe. Galaxies, on average, are running away from each other at an ever-increasing pace (that’s the 2011 Nobel Prize). It also has other, subtler effects, as it influences the history and evolution of structures in the universe.

In terms of structure growth, dark matter accelerates clustering, while dark energy slows it down – a bit like a tug-of-war. Dark matter seemed to be winning in the earlier phases, when the universe was significantly younger; later, dark energy started to win."



When we chart the positions and motions of galaxies, what hidden stories do those patterns tell us about dark matter, the universe’s shape, or its evolution?

The signal is small and statistical in nature, but very powerful. Through these patterns, we can map the expansion history of the universe and the way its structures formed – galaxies, groups of galaxies, and so on. These act like little light bulbs on a dark scaffold made of dark matter, which is being shaped by gravity. By tracing the pattern of these bulbs, we can probe the nature of gravity, the nature of dark energy and dark matter, and the properties of the matter we know exists, such as neutrinos. We can also ask questions like: how did the universe begin, and what physics is at play? And we can even ask ourselves – did we get it right, or are we fooling ourselves and the universe actually doesn’t work the way we think it does? I find all that quite cool.



What keeps you motivated to study questions that may never have definitive answers, and how do you stay excited about that kind of challenge?

If you put it in those words, it does sound foolish – or at least eccentric! I suppose one could reframe it in terms of curiosity. If the answer to any of these questions were easy, somebody would have found it already. It’s true that the eureka moments are quite exceptional in the life (and work) of any scientist. But science and progress are not achieved only through big discoveries. Although those are always one’s stretch goal, it’s about the journey as much as it is about the destination. There is a lot of value, and much to be learned, along the journey – even in the absence of major discoveries.





The interview was published 16th October 2025 and conducted by the Academia Europaea Cardiff Knowledge Hub.
For further information please contact AECardiffHub@cardiff.ac.uk.

Imprint Privacy policy « This page (revision-3) was last changed on Friday, 17. October 2025, 22:26 by Kaiser Dana
  • operated by